Defining organisational performance: an asset management perspective
One of the key benefits of Asset Management is to generate value for the organisation and its stakeholders. However, Most asset management metrics focus on the performance of a specific asset or group of assets.
This paper considers performance metrics in terms of the organisation as a whole by assessing the performance of selected ASX listed companies from an asset management perspective. It examines how companies create value for stakeholders through consideration of performance, costs and risk, by comparing equity growth with cash flow return on physical assets. This comparison forms the basis for future examination of leading practices.
As presented at the AMPEAK 2015 Asset Management Conference
One of the key benefits of Asset Management is to generate value for the organisation and its stakeholders. However, Most asset management metrics focus on the performance of a specific asset or group of assets.
This paper considers performance metrics in terms of the organisation as a whole by assessing the performance of selected ASX listed companies from an asset management perspective. It examines how companies create value for stakeholders through consideration of performance, costs and risk, by comparing equity growth with cash flow return on physical assets. This comparison forms the basis for future examination of leading practices.
As presented at the AMPEAK 2015 Asset Management Conference
One of the key benefits of Asset Management is to generate value for the organisation and its stakeholders. However, Most asset management metrics focus on the performance of a specific asset or group of assets.
This paper considers performance metrics in terms of the organisation as a whole by assessing the performance of selected ASX listed companies from an asset management perspective. It examines how companies create value for stakeholders through consideration of performance, costs and risk, by comparing equity growth with cash flow return on physical assets. This comparison forms the basis for future examination of leading practices.
As presented at the AMPEAK 2015 Asset Management Conference
